| FEATURED COMMENTARY | Email this page to a friend, Send mail! |
COMING SOON – THE HOUSE UN-OBAMA ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE By Don Feder June 7, 2010
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION(.pdf)
Here’s the first concrete evidence of global warming: Deval Partick’s brain is melting.
Speaking at Suffolk University Law School late last month, the Democratic Governor of Massachusetts became the latest, and most prominent, liberal to charge that refusing to roll over for Obama was borderline treason.
What he calls reflex opposition to the messiah-in-chief’s program “is almost at the level of sedition…I’m most frustrated by folks who seem to be rooting for failure,” Patrick charged. Like, Democrats never rooted for Ronald Reagan, Bush 41 or W. to slip and fall flat on their faces. They did handstands, cartwheels and goal-post victory dances (while waving pom-poms wildly in the air) every time a Republican president failed to achieve his policy goals.
“The number of people in the Grand Old Party who seem to be absolutely committed to saying ‘No,’ whenever he (the prez) says ‘Yes’ … is just extraordinary,” Patrick confessed. Liberals have always been mystified by rejection of their agenda, usually attributing this to stupidity, malice, misanthropy or lunacy. Perhaps, like their Soviet counterparts, they’ll end up consigning us to mental institutions.
Head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division under Clinton, Patrick is Obama’s best friend among the governors. He’s also the latest leftie to charge conservatives with sedition, which leads to the reasonable assumption that this ongoing campaign is part of the White House strategy to discredit its critics.
On the anniversary of the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, ex-President William Jefferson Clinton began beating his favorite drum: That anti-government rhetoric on the right leads to violence. (“There can be real consequences when what you say animates people who do those things you would never do,” the perjurer-in-chief warned a very receptive The New York Times) But if words incite deeds, how much more so do actions? Recall the staggering increase in adultery, oral sex in the workplace, and lying under oath following the revelations in the Lewinsky case.
Partick has upped the ante. In recent weeks, conservative talkers like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck have been accused of sedition for saying mean things about the current occupant of the White House (in Limbaugh’s case, referring to Obama’s administration as a “regime”).
Earlier, Time Magazine columnist Joe Klein explained to fellow media-droid Chris Matthews that political rhetoric “especially the ones (sic.) coming from people like Glenn Beck and to a certain extent Sarah Palin, rub right up close to being seditious.”
The non-thinking of the left here has evolved from hateful/hurtful words about St. Barack being seditious to Congressional opposition to the president’s legislative agenda constituting sedition. What’s next, seditious bumper-stickers? Seditious humor?
In the popular mind, “sedition” is first cousin to treason. In law, it’s a felony defined as “a revolt or an incitement to revolt against established authority.”
You know what, I can’t recall a single reported instance of any speaker at a Tea Party rally telling activists to march on Washington, overthrow the current “regime,” demolish the Capitol brick by brick, and send Obama into exile. Far from being revolutionary, the goal of the Tea Parties this year is to mobilize an army of outraged and informed voters to march to the ballot box and send Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and other Obamaites in Congress into a happy retirement. FYI, this is known as democracy.
Let’s start with what sedition is not. (Deval Patrick and Joe Klein, you may want to take notes here.) Sedition is not saying naughty things about your political opponents, up to and including the President of the United States. It may be hyperbole. It may be overblown rhetoric. It may even be slander or libel. Sedition it ain’t.
When Bush was president, the left acted like a pack of rabid, mutant dogs. Bush was a “dictator,” a “tyrant” and a “fascist,” who stole the 2000 election, and engineered the war with Iraq (manufacturing evidence of weapons of mass destruction) to sate his bloodlust. Those are about the kindest things Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan (“The biggest terrorist in the world is George W. Bush.”) and George Soros (who compared W. to the Nazis) had to say about our 43rd president.
Then there was the assassination chic – leftist playwrights, comics and commentators who publicly fantasized about offing Bush. The foregoing was complemented by “kill Bush” buttons, posters and t-shirts.
Prior to the 2004 election, a columnist for the Guardian in the U.K. wrote that if Bush won, it would disprove the existence of God and lead to “four more years of idiocy, arrogance and unwarranted bloodshed, with no benevolent deity to watch over and save us, John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckly Jr., -- where are you now that we need you?”
The above was moronic, ugly and slanderous. It was not seditious, and no one in the media -- no Republican counterpart of Patrick -- suggested it was.
Sedition isn’t opposing the president’s plans – even when that opposition seems intransigent and wholly unreasonable to his supporters, and constitutes rooting for the big guy to fail. If so, a majority of Americans are guilty of sedition.
According to a May Rasmussen poll, 10 weeks after it passed, 63% of Americans favored repeal of Obama-care. A Zogby Poll informed us that by a 3-to-1 margin, Americans want the fate of don’t-ask-don’t-tell (repeal of which is now being rammed through Congress at the behest of Butch Obama) decided by the military, not by politicians. The daily Rasmussen poll for May 29 showed 40% of voters “strongly disapprove” of Obama’s performance, with 28% strongly approving. Call out the troops! Read the riot act!
Sedition is – well, perhaps a few examples will illustrate the point. Sedition is, as noted above, calling for the violent overthrow of the duly elected government. Sedition is assaulting cops and troops, throwing rocks, bottles and nail-studded tennis balls at the boys in blue (which I witnessed in Harvard Square, circa 1969).
Sedition is blowing up government buildings, like Barack-buddy Bill Ayers. (“I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough.”) It’s plotting to assassinate government officials. It’s going to Hanoi during the Vietnam War, calling American soldiers “war criminals,” and urging the defeat of U.S. forces.
In other words, it’s what the New Left – the intellectual progenitors of the modern Democratic Party – did during the Viet Nam era. Those who should have gone to jail in the ‘60s and didn’t (and their ideological progeny) are now accusing loyal Americans of sedition, based on our quite reasonable detestation of a man who is in the process of radically remaking this nation in the image of a Euro-socialist state.
In a political debate dripping with irony, this is the most ironic. The case file should read “Traitor Left Accuses Patriotic Right of Sedition.” Okay, that’s a bit of hyperbole too. But, at the very least, those who are blithely flinging around charges of “sedition” are traitors of the heart.
The un-American left charging the patriotic right with sedition is the ultimate chutzpah. Coming soon: the House Un-Obama Activities Committee?
“Do you identify with the Tea Party movement?”
“Are you committed to saying ‘No’ whenever the president says ‘Yes’”?
“Do you question this administration’s legitimacy?”
“Do you believe Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya, Indonesia or on the planet Zorak in the Klaatu nebula?”
“Are you now, or have you ever been, a Rush Limbaugh listener or a Glenn Back viewer?”
“Are you rooting for the president to fail?”
Oh, God, yes!
An earlier version of this commentary appeared on GrassTopsUSA.com
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION(.pdf)
|
|
| PREVIOUSLY FEATURED COMMENTARY | Email this page to a friend, Send mail! |
THEY’RE SO SMART AND WE’RE SO DUH – THE INTELLECTUAL PRETENSIONS OF THE LEFT by Don Feder May 28 , 2010
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION(.pdf)
It’s one thing to be sneered at by The New York Times, but The Cape Cod Time? What next, being reviled by a suburban shoppers weekly?
An April 11th editorial in that learned journal (“Tea Party tactics: Can we learn from the history of anti-intellectualism?”) charged that the Tea Parties were the latest sign of the grass-roots rebellion against the intelligentsia. “Faced with 20th.-century celebration of reason, rationalism, science worship, big government, naturalism, materialism and idealism,” the paper observed, “the far right has chafed at its inability to stem the tide.” Note the maladroit lumping together of big government with reason and science.
And so, the knuckle-draggers of Tea Party America have turned their slack-jawed gaze on their intellectual betters. The If-You’re-Fond-of-Sand-Dunes-And-Salty-Air Times claims: “Today, the Tea Party movement echoes, by and large, the long-standing tradition of characterizing intellectuals as pretentious know-it-alls who, while well-educated, possess neither morality nor common sense.”
Perhaps that’s because history is full of examples of well-educated monsters. The Nazi student movement took over German universities long before Hitler came to power. The mass book-burnings which took place in the Reich in May of 1933 were orchestrated by the German Students’ Association (Deutsche Studentenschaft), with the enthusiastic support of the German professoriate. Following in that grand tradition, storm troopers of the campus left terrorize dissident speakers (the 21st century equivalent of non-Aryan ideas).
But the intellectual light of the land of tourist kitsch and twin lobsters for $19.95 isn’t through with us troglodytes. “For extreme conservatives (everyone to the right of Dennis Kucinich), higher education seems always to lead to threats to the stability of the social order. And the contemplative side of the mind, which is what defines the intellect, has always been feared and distrusted.”
The media left assumes that conservatives fear and distrust higher education because we’re mostly semi-literates with bad teeth, who drive pickup trucks and marry our cousins. But Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to have a 4-year college degree. According to the National Education Studies, based on data from 1995 to 2005, 27% of self-identified Democrats had a 4-year degree, versus 36% of Republicans -- although, admittedly, most of us didn’t pursue majors as intellectually challenging as journalism.
Still, anyone who can define higher education today as reflecting “the contemplative side of the mind,” hasn’t been on campus since students stopped wearing argyle socks and doing the Charleston. Most undergrads can’t place the Civil War within half-a-century, have the vocabulary of fifth-graders of a generation ago, and include binge-drinking among their scholarly pursuits. The prospect of encountering a serious idea at one of these institutions is comparable to meeting a woman’s studies major who shaves her legs.
When I worked for the Boston Herald, I once had a letter from a student at a well-respected private college urging me to “tell the hole truth (sic.).” I don’t recall if he meant the truth about black holes or potholes.
The problem with colleges and universities is that they represent not the lofty heights of learning but what’s been called the closing of the American mind.
As we approach the second decade of the 21st century, academia is distinguished primarily by intellectual rigidity. On the average college campus, debate is discouraged and unorthodox ideas vigorously suppressed. At Ohio State University in 2006, almost the entire faculty filed harassment charges against a librarian for recommending four conservative books to incoming freshmen. (Building a bonfire and consigning “It Takes A Family” and “The Professors” to the flames would have been too obvious.)
Oh how the Cape Cod Times longs for the days when conservatives could speak in more than monosyllables. “It is disappointing to see that in the passing of William F. Buckley Jr., who was a genuine conservative intellectual, the void has been filled, to a large degree, by populist demagogues who fan the flames of class warfare while ranting about a lost America,” the journal sniffs.
Would that be the same William F. Buckley, Jr., who once remarked, “I would rather be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than the two thousand people on the faculty of Harvard University”? How the host of PBS’s “Firing Line” must have feared and distrusted the contemplative side of the mind, as manifested at Whatsamatta U.
The left’s token conservative intellectual also observed: “The largest cultural menace in America is the conformity of intellectual cliques which, in education as well as the arts, are out to impose upon the nation their modish fads and fallacies …. In this cultural issue, we are, without reservation, on the side of excellence (rather than newness) and honest intellectual combat (rather than conformity).”
The Times’ compliant is a typical media conceit – We’re so smart it hurts, while you’re dumber than dirt. Most of the reporters and editors I encountered in two decades of journalism weren’t exactly Mensa members – many would have difficulty spelling Mensa.
Opponents of the left can never be merely misguided; we’re always stupid or evil. Thus Bush and Reagan were reputed to be 40-watt bulbs, while Carter, Clinton and Obama are said to have intellects that shine like a supernova. Every time Bubba’s zipper went down his IQ went up.
The man Obama called his mentor thinks the United States government invented HIV and crack cocaine as “a means of genocide against people of color.” I wonder if, like his hero Louis Farrakhan, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright thinks the white race was created by a renegade black scientist named Yakub, 6,000 years ago. This is the great mind that shaped our president’s prodigious intellect.
Get him away from a teleprompter, and the president sounds like Chevy Chase doing Gerald Ford on the old “Saturday Night Live.” While campaigning for the White House in Oregon, in May 2008, Obama disclosed: “Over the past 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states.” The president may have been thinking of the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference, an entity he often confuses with the United States of America.
At a speech in Strasbourg in April 2009, the savant referred to the language of Austria as – what else? --“Austrian.” Remarking on the similarities between American and European politics, the president observed: “There’s a whole lot of – I don’t know what the term is in Austrian – wheeling and dealing ….” What’s the Austrian for “dummkopf”?
At this year’s national prayer breakfast, conducted in Arabic, when speaking of a Navy corpsman, the prodigy-in-chief pronounced the word “corpse-man” – you know, like the United States Marine Corpse. To paraphrase the butler in “Arthur,” “usually, one must go to a bowling alley” to meet a man of the president’s “stature.”
Vice Joe President Biden speaks gibberish, fluently. As a candidate in 2008, Biden told Katy Couric that when the stock market crashed in 1929, President Roosevelt went on television to explain the crisis to his fellow Americans. Oh, stop nitpicking, the media harrumphed, when it was noted that Hoover was president on Black Friday, Roosevelt took office in 1933, and the first televised presidential address was in 1947. (FDR’s fireside chats were via radio.) Maybe Joe was quoting one of Neil Kinnock’s speeches, without attribution.
Any list of great minds of the donkey serenade must include Nancy Pelosi, who told us in 2009 that unless the administration’s latest stimulus package passed, “500 million Americans would lose their jobs.” In a nation of 330 million, that means an unemployment rate of roughly 151%. So, the sea level will rise 20-feet due to global warming (according to Al Gore), and we’ll have triple digit unemployment.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is the stuff of legend. In January, the Nevadan attributed Obama’s political success to his pale skin and lack of a “Negro dialect.” And he doesn’t tap-dance, another distinct advantage. Reid also paused to remark, “You can always tell when it is summertime (in Washington) because you can smell the visitors” (OK, so we’re stupid and we stink) -- this from a man who looks like he just crawled out of a landfill.
Reid brings to mind of a comment often attributed to former House Speaker Joe Cannon, who is said to have commented about one of his rivals, “Every time the man opens his mouth, he detracts from the sum total of human wisdom.”
The late-Ted Kennedy (expelled from Harvard for cheating on an exam), who was a resident of Hyannis on the Cape, was another deep-thinker, or, as he was wont to say, “I-ah, er-ah, well-ah … Sammy Sooser.”
Point of clarification: If leftists are so brilliant, why do they keep coming up with policies and plans that defy logic and human experience? To wit:
The mind-numbing stupidity of liberals aside, their pretensions are laughable, given their fascist mindset (mentality)
The hallmark of an authentic intellectual is willingness to engage in a frank discussion, or at least to let the other side be heard.
Modern liberals might as well march around wearing jackboots and arm bands.
Censorship is the sine qua non of the left. Whether it’s campus speech codes (which punish the expression of ideas liberals find abhorrent), hate-crime laws or ongoing attempts to destroy talk-radio, liberals are committed to silencing the opposition. Intellectuals who fear intellectual competition, that’s a new one.
Beyond censorship, the left’s seeks to short-circuit an open discussion of a broad range of issues, where it tells the debate is closed.
Thus, it you doubt liberal dogma on global warming, AIDS education, abortion, gay marriage, and other matters where the masses refuse to bow their heads, tug their forelocks and do as they’re told, you’re labeled anti-science, misogynistic, racist, homophobic and generally hateful.
On climate change, the left (the mainstream media included) smears skeptics by calling them “global-warming deniers.” The allusion to the Holocaust is intentional. Those who question revealed wisdom on sea-levels rising 20 feet and polar bears surfing in Hawaiian shirts are portrayed as a lunatic-fringe -- flat-earthers of the 21st. century.
The intellectual tactics of contemplative minds on the left include censorship, fear of opposing ideas, intimidation, shouting down dissenting speakers, indoctrination and smears.
As a matter of fact, conservatives are intimidated by all of the big brains in the liberal camp. We’re also envious of Hillary’s good looks, Michael Moore’s physique, Rosie O’Donnell’s charm and John Edwards’ integrity. It’s doubtful that, outside its editorial offices, anyone takes The Cape Cod Times seriously. But the paper still provides a useful service. On the Cape, there’s never a shortage of fish to be wrapped.
An earlier version of this commentary appeared on GrassTopsUSA.com
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION(.pdf)
|
CLICK HERE to send Don your comments.CLICK HERE FOR DON'S COMMENT PAGE |








